This post was written by APMA’s Director of Scientific Affairs James R. Christina, DPM.

James R. Christina, DPM

James R. Christina, DPM, Director of Scientific Affairs

Just when you thought you had figured out the CMS electronic prescribing (eRx) program to avoid the payment reduction in 2012, the agency releases a proposed rule with additional penalty exemptions. But let’s go back to the beginning of this story. Over the past several years, CMS has implemented incentive payment programs to promote the use of quality measures, like the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), and to encourage electronic prescribing.  Although these programs are voluntary, those who participate are able to receive additional monetary incentives. In 2009, CMS reported that successful participants in the PQRI (now PQRS) program received about $2,000 per eligible provider, and successful participants in the eRx program received about $3,000 per eligible provider.  So those who did not participate potentially missed out on an additional $5,000 in payments from CMS.  APMA has provided webinars and resources on how to participate in these programs and receive the incentive payments.

For 2011, CMS is again offering incentive payments for participating in eRx (1 percent of your total part B billings for the year) and for participating in the PQRS (also a 1 percent bonus).  Again, participation to obtain these incentive payments is voluntary, but now there is a twist. In 2012, based on your use of electronic prescribing in 2011, you may be subject to a 1 percent payment reduction for all of your 2012 CMS billings.

Originally, the program required participants to write 10 unique e-prescriptions using a qualified e-prescribing system between January 1 and June 30, 2011.  Due to the way the measure is written, this essentially meant that only e-prescriptions done in conjunction with an office visit (evaluation and management codes) counted toward the 10 unique prescriptions. The measure included a few exceptions, including hardship for lack of Internet access in rural areas, lack of pharmacies in rural areas that accepted e-prescriptions, having less than 100 visits in the denominator of the measure (essentially evaluation and management visit codes) or if those codes in the denominator represented less than 10 percent of your total Part B billings for the six-month period.

Now CMS is adding four other potential exemptions, if the proposed rule is adopted:

  • Purchasing and registering a certified electronic health record (EHR) system with the intent to report meaningful use of the EHR
  • Inability to electronically prescribe due to local, state, or federal law or regulation;
  • Limited prescribing activity (eligible professional who prescribed fewer than 10 prescriptions between January 1 and June 30, 2011, regardless of whether the prescriptions were electronically prescribed or not)
  • Insufficient opportunities to report the electronic prescribing measure due to limitations of the measure’s denominator (eligible professional does write prescriptions but they are not associated with office visit codes, e.g. surgeon)

APMA’s advice is to still try to meet the original requirements of 10 e-prescriptions before June 30, 2011, in order to avoid the uncertainty of being exempt under the new proposed rule. More information about e-prescribing, including a webinar on the CMS eRx deadline, can be found on the APMA website.

 

4 Responses to “CMS eRx Deadline June 30 to Avoid Penalties — or Is It?”

  1. Where does the Podiatrist report his insufficient opportunities exemptions to CMS in order to not get the 2012 reduction?

    • Glenn Gastwirth, DPM says:

      Hello Dr. Burns, thanks for your question. The insufficient opportunities exemption is part of the proposed rule for additional exemptions. Until the final rule is released, there is no mechanism to report that exemption. (The proposed rule discusses establishing a website for providers to report the additional exemptions.)

      Once the final rule comes out APMA will make sure the membership knows how to report the additional exemptions.

  2. Our practice just entered a financial agreement to start using Biomedix TRAKnet. We have not yet started eRx but will try using AllScript over the next two weeks. Since we may not get 10 scripts each done by 6/30/11 deadline, could we possibly be exempt from the 1% penalty if we are just starting EMR/EHR? Thank you.

    • Glenn Gastwirth, DPM says:

      Medicare has proposed this exemption:

      Eligible Professionals Who Register to Participate in the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs and Adopt Certified EHR Technology:

      To be considered for a significant hardship exemption under this category, CMS is proposing that the eligible professional, at a minimum, must:
      (1) have registered for either the Medicare or Medicaid EHR Incentive Program (That would require having purchased an ONC Certified EHR program)
      (2) provide identifying information as to the certified EHR technology (as defined at 45 CFR 170.102) that has been adopted for use no later than October 1, 2011, for a hardship exemption to be submitted, which then would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis

      Assuming that this proposed rule is adopted and you do not get your 10 qualified eRx visits done by June 30, you will need to register your EHR program with CMS and then provide the information to CMS that you are requesting an exemption by October 1, 2011. CMS is indicating that they will have a website where you will be able to apply for exemptions by providing:

      - Identifying information such as the TIN, NPI, name, mailing address, and e-mail address of all affected eligible professionals
      - The significant hardship exemption category(ies) that apply
      - A justification statement describing how compliance with the requirement for being a successful electronic prescriber for the 2012 eRx payment adjustment during the reporting period would result in a significant hardship to the eligible professional or group practice
      - An attestation of the accuracy of the information provided